Cody

William

2
Rank
74
Badges
36995
Score
1 – 50 of 3,755

William submitted a Comment to Problem 45408. Yoonir - 03

Hi Asif, I'm puzzled. Now 2 people have submitted solutions that agree with the test suite, but the test suite seems wrong to me! Looking at all 3 'yoonir' problems for a radius of 10 units: Program Points test_suite my_calc yoonir_02 5 112.27 112.26 yoonir_04 6 173.20 173.21 yoonir_06 7 108.34 210.17 How would it be possible that in going from a 6 pointed star to a 7 pointed star, the area drops from 173.2 to 108.3?

on 5 Apr 2020 at 16:42

William submitted Solution 2193836 to Problem 45389. Knight's Watch

on 5 Apr 2020 at 15:55

William submitted Solution 2193830 to Problem 45389. Knight's Watch

on 5 Apr 2020 at 15:42

William submitted Solution 2192738 to Problem 45401. ZigZag - 02

on 5 Apr 2020 at 2:13

William liked Problem 45422. Coin Distribution - 02

on 5 Apr 2020 at 1:04

William submitted Solution 2192717 to Problem 45416. Don't be Greedy!

on 5 Apr 2020 at 0:44

William submitted Solution 2192273 to Problem 45418. En passant - 01

on 4 Apr 2020 at 17:02

William submitted Solution 2190685 to Problem 45423. Bernoulli's Triangle

on 3 Apr 2020 at 16:58

William received Community Group Solver badge for Chemical Engineering Problems I

on 3 Apr 2020 at 16:21

William received Community Group Solver badge for Date & Time II

on 3 Apr 2020 at 16:20

William submitted Solution 2189110 to Problem 45420. Abelian Sandpile - 01

on 2 Apr 2020 at 19:54

William submitted Solution 2189127 to Problem 45421. Abelian Sandpile - 02

on 2 Apr 2020 at 19:30

William submitted Solution 2186778 to Problem 45404. ZigZag - 04

on 1 Apr 2020 at 16:21

William submitted a Comment to Problem 45404. ZigZag - 04

Asif, I think some of the solution vectors in this problem are incorrect. In problem 2, for example, all the numbers after 120 are duplicates.

on 31 Mar 2020 at 21:38

William submitted Solution 2184985 to Problem 45407. Yoonir - 02

on 31 Mar 2020 at 20:58

William submitted Solution 2184976 to Problem 45406. Yoonir - 01

on 31 Mar 2020 at 20:23

William submitted Solution 2184609 to Problem 45405. ZigZag - 05

on 31 Mar 2020 at 17:45

William submitted Solution 2184631 to Problem 45410. Mid-term report

on 31 Mar 2020 at 17:25

William submitted Solution 2184626 to Problem 45409. MinMax mapping

on 31 Mar 2020 at 17:16

William submitted Solution 2184582 to Problem 45403. ZigZag - 03

on 31 Mar 2020 at 16:41

William submitted Solution 2184555 to Problem 45399. ZigZag - 01

on 31 Mar 2020 at 16:22

William received Community Group Solver badge for Date & Time I

on 27 Mar 2020 at 1:54

William submitted Solution 2177004 to Problem 45373. Hanging cable - 01

on 26 Mar 2020 at 21:02

William liked Problem 45379. 3rd side of a Triangle

on 26 Mar 2020 at 16:22

William submitted Solution 2176624 to Problem 45379. 3rd side of a Triangle

on 26 Mar 2020 at 16:20

William submitted Solution 2176566 to Problem 45388. Gapful numbers

on 26 Mar 2020 at 15:38

William submitted Solution 2176529 to Problem 45390. Find 0 in array

on 26 Mar 2020 at 15:18

William submitted Solution 2176525 to Problem 45385. Coin distribution

on 26 Mar 2020 at 15:11

William submitted Solution 2176482 to Problem 45387. Anagram

on 26 Mar 2020 at 14:51

William submitted a Comment to Problem 45373. Hanging cable - 01

Asif, Yes, what I was trying to say is that if the only clearance is that which is provided by the catenary curve y=a*cosh(x/a) itself, then you are not allowed to specify a cable length that is more than twice the height of the poles. That is because there will be some (typically small) values of pole separation at which the cable will hit the ground. It's not that there would not be a larger value of pole separation at which the cable had the specified length. A solution would undoubtedly exist. It's just that having the cable lying on the ground for small separation would introduce some ambiguity about the problem. The only way to avoid this, for long cables, would be to add an additional clearance that was large enough to keep the cable off the ground even when the pole separation went to zero. Anyway, I noticed that some of the current test problems violate this rule, and would require a third input parameter that specifies what the added clearance is.

on 25 Mar 2020 at 0:37

William submitted Solution 2173363 to Problem 45384. Sum! Sum! Sum!

on 24 Mar 2020 at 22:13

William submitted Solution 2173354 to Problem 45384. Sum! Sum! Sum!

on 24 Mar 2020 at 22:05

William submitted Solution 2173350 to Problem 45384. Sum! Sum! Sum!

on 24 Mar 2020 at 20:47

William submitted Solution 2173325 to Problem 45381. Maya long Count

on 24 Mar 2020 at 20:27

1 – 50 of 3,755