Trouble Creating a Vector using a for loop with matrices

13 views (last 30 days)
I'm having trouble creating a vector of answers with a for loop involving matrices. When I call on w, it gives me different values than if I were to call on a specific part of w.
B1=[1 0; 0 -7.5];
D1=[0 0;0 10];
X1=[0 0;0 -2.5];
B2=[49.8 0;-0.127 -50];
D2=[25 0;0 25];
A2=[25 0;0 25];
B3=[49.8 0;-0.127 -50];
D3=[25 0;0 25];
A3=[25 0;0 25];
B4=[49.8 0;-0.127 -50];
D4=[25 0;0 25];
A4=[25 0;0 25];
B5=[7.5 0;0 1];
A5=[-10 0;0 0];
Y5=[2.5 0;0 0];
o=[0 0;0 0];
%M
M=[B1 D1 X1 o o;A2 B2 D2 o o;o A3 B3 D3 o;o o A4 B4 D4;o o Y5 A5 B5];
Mi=inv(M);
G=[.21;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0.127];
CG=[.1;.1;.1;.1;.1;.1;.1;.1;.1;.1];
%find L
%L=[b1 o o o o;a2 b2 o o o;o a3 b3 o o;o o a4 b4 o;o o y5 a5 b5]
%U=[I -E1 -x1 o o;o I -E2 o o;o o I -E3 o;o o o I -E4;o o o o I]
n=2;
NJ=5;
w=zeros(2*NJ,1);
for j=1
L(1:(j+1),1:(j+1))=B1; %b(1)=B1
U(1:j+1,j+2:j+3)=-inv(L(1:j+1,1:j+1))*D1; %E(1)=D1*inv(-b(1))
U(1:j+1,2*j+3:2*j+4)=-inv(L(1:j+1,1:j+1))*X1; %x(1)=X1*inv(-b(1))
w(1:2)=inv(L(1:j+1,1:j+1))*G(1:2); %ksi(1) = b(1)^-1 * G(1)
end
for j=2:NJ-1
L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-3:2*j-2)=A2; %a(2)=A2
L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-1:2*j)=B2+L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-3:2*j-2)*U(2*(j-1)-1:2*(j-1),2*(j-1)+1:2*(j-1)+2); %b(2)=B2+a(2)*E(1)
U(2*j-1:2*j,2*j+1:2*j+2)=-inv(L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-1:2*j))*D2; %E(2)=-inv(b(2))*D(2)
w(2*j-1:2*j)=-inv(L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-1:2*j))*((-G(2*j-1:2*j)+(L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-3:2*j-2)*w((2*(j-1)-1):(2*(j-1)))))); %ksi(2)=inv(-b(2))*(-G(2)+a(2)*ksi(1))
end
for j=NJ
L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-5:2*j-4)=Y5; %y(5)=Y5
L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-3:2*j-2)=A5+L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-5:2*j-4)*U(2*(j-2)-1:2*(j-2),2*(j-2)+1:2*(j-2)+2); %a(5)=A5+y(5)*E(NJ-2)
L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-1:2*j)=B5+L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-3:2*j-2)*U(2*(j-1)-1:2*(j-1),2*(j-1)+1:2*(j-1)+2); %b(5)=B5+a(5)*E(4)
w(2*j-1:2*j)=-inv(L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-1:2*j))*(-G(2*j-1:2*j)+L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-3:2*j-2)*w(2*(j-1)-1:2*(j-1))+L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-5:2*j-4)*w(2*(j-2)-1:2*(j-2)))%-inv(b(5))*(-G(5)+a(5)*w(4)+y*(w(3))
end
%w=inv(L)*G
%C=inv(U)*w
  1 Comment
Stephen23
Stephen23 on 7 Nov 2019
Note: to make your code more efficient and robust you should probably be using mldivide instead of inv and *. Explicit matrix inversion is rarely required (because there are better methods for solving such systems of equations).

Sign in to comment.

Answers (0)

Categories

Find more on Programming in Help Center and File Exchange

Products


Release

R2019b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!