Trouble Creating a Vector using a for loop with matrices
13 views (last 30 days)
Show older comments
I'm having trouble creating a vector of answers with a for loop involving matrices. When I call on w, it gives me different values than if I were to call on a specific part of w.
B1=[1 0; 0 -7.5];
D1=[0 0;0 10];
X1=[0 0;0 -2.5];
B2=[49.8 0;-0.127 -50];
D2=[25 0;0 25];
A2=[25 0;0 25];
B3=[49.8 0;-0.127 -50];
D3=[25 0;0 25];
A3=[25 0;0 25];
B4=[49.8 0;-0.127 -50];
D4=[25 0;0 25];
A4=[25 0;0 25];
B5=[7.5 0;0 1];
A5=[-10 0;0 0];
Y5=[2.5 0;0 0];
o=[0 0;0 0];
%M
M=[B1 D1 X1 o o;A2 B2 D2 o o;o A3 B3 D3 o;o o A4 B4 D4;o o Y5 A5 B5];
Mi=inv(M);
G=[.21;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0.127];
CG=[.1;.1;.1;.1;.1;.1;.1;.1;.1;.1];
%find L
%L=[b1 o o o o;a2 b2 o o o;o a3 b3 o o;o o a4 b4 o;o o y5 a5 b5]
%U=[I -E1 -x1 o o;o I -E2 o o;o o I -E3 o;o o o I -E4;o o o o I]
n=2;
NJ=5;
w=zeros(2*NJ,1);
for j=1
L(1:(j+1),1:(j+1))=B1; %b(1)=B1
U(1:j+1,j+2:j+3)=-inv(L(1:j+1,1:j+1))*D1; %E(1)=D1*inv(-b(1))
U(1:j+1,2*j+3:2*j+4)=-inv(L(1:j+1,1:j+1))*X1; %x(1)=X1*inv(-b(1))
w(1:2)=inv(L(1:j+1,1:j+1))*G(1:2); %ksi(1) = b(1)^-1 * G(1)
end
for j=2:NJ-1
L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-3:2*j-2)=A2; %a(2)=A2
L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-1:2*j)=B2+L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-3:2*j-2)*U(2*(j-1)-1:2*(j-1),2*(j-1)+1:2*(j-1)+2); %b(2)=B2+a(2)*E(1)
U(2*j-1:2*j,2*j+1:2*j+2)=-inv(L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-1:2*j))*D2; %E(2)=-inv(b(2))*D(2)
w(2*j-1:2*j)=-inv(L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-1:2*j))*((-G(2*j-1:2*j)+(L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-3:2*j-2)*w((2*(j-1)-1):(2*(j-1)))))); %ksi(2)=inv(-b(2))*(-G(2)+a(2)*ksi(1))
end
for j=NJ
L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-5:2*j-4)=Y5; %y(5)=Y5
L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-3:2*j-2)=A5+L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-5:2*j-4)*U(2*(j-2)-1:2*(j-2),2*(j-2)+1:2*(j-2)+2); %a(5)=A5+y(5)*E(NJ-2)
L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-1:2*j)=B5+L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-3:2*j-2)*U(2*(j-1)-1:2*(j-1),2*(j-1)+1:2*(j-1)+2); %b(5)=B5+a(5)*E(4)
w(2*j-1:2*j)=-inv(L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-1:2*j))*(-G(2*j-1:2*j)+L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-3:2*j-2)*w(2*(j-1)-1:2*(j-1))+L(2*j-1:2*j,2*j-5:2*j-4)*w(2*(j-2)-1:2*(j-2)))%-inv(b(5))*(-G(5)+a(5)*w(4)+y*(w(3))
end
%w=inv(L)*G
%C=inv(U)*w
1 Comment
Stephen23
on 7 Nov 2019
Note: to make your code more efficient and robust you should probably be using mldivide instead of inv and *. Explicit matrix inversion is rarely required (because there are better methods for solving such systems of equations).
Answers (0)
See Also
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!