Why Im_ref = 2⋅T ref /3⋅p⋅λ pm for Interior PMSM? in MTPA Control Reference
2 views (last 30 days)
Show older comments
according to equation: Te= 3/2*p*(λpm*iq+(Ld− Lq)*id*iq)
Im_ref should not equal to 2⋅T ref /3⋅p⋅λ pm for interior PMSM, right? Thanks!
4 Comments
Rik
on 1 Nov 2022
This is too deep for me. If it is incorrect, you should contact support to have that verified and corrected.
If it is correct but you simply do not understand, I suspect your question is better suited elsewhere.
Answers (1)
Joel Van Sickel
on 1 Nov 2022
The first equation your have underlined is the maximum current reference limit used for a specific type of control ( MTPA) while the other equation is the mathematical model of of a motor (albeit a simplified equation as this is for a lumped parameter motor model). These equations are not the same nor should they be, although the controller algorithm is derived from the mathematical model equation (elimnate the (Ld-Lq)*id*iq by setting id to zero and they are identical. Further work is required in the controller after calculating maximum current to calculate reference id and iq current values.
2 Comments
Joel Van Sickel
on 10 Nov 2022
you are correct, it would be slightly different, which is why the equation for the model is more specific to account for this case.
See Also
Categories
Find more on Control Algorithm Design in Help Center and File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!