Is there a Faster alternative to ismember function ?

38 views (last 30 days)
Hello everybody,
I have a matirx with big size of row.
and with this I want to re-define the "el" variable using the first column of "nd" variable.
I tried to put this place using the ismember function. But I feels it is quite slow... it took about 3 minutes.
Is there a faster function or a way to replace it?
clear; close all; clc;
% nd has 10 by 5.
nd = [1 0 0 0.36 0; ...
2 0 -0.02 0.33 0; ...
3 0 -0.51 0.33 0; ...
4 0 -0.81 0.33 0; ...
5 0 -0.01 0.33 0; ...
6 0 -0.01 0.33 0; ...
7 0 -0.17 0.33 0; ...
8 0 -0.02 0.33 0; ...
9 0 -0.02 0.33 0; ...
10 0 -0.02 0.33 0];
eld = [1 2; 2 3; 3 4; 4 1; 1 3; 1 2];
% To make "el2" variable, I hope to convert the 1 as 1 0 0 0.36 0 from nd variable. and 2 as 2 0 -0.02 0.33 0.
% I tried using for loop as below. It takes quite long time for the matirx with big size of row.
for i=1:length(eld)
ind1 = find(ismember(nd(:,1),eld(i,1))); % find index to get the data row from nd variable.
ind2 = find(ismember(nd(:,1),eld(i,2)));
% re-define the "el" variable using the first column of "nd" variable.
eld2(i,:) = [nd(ind1,1), nd(ind1,2), nd(ind1,3), nd(ind1,4), nd(ind1,5), ...
nd(ind2,1), nd(ind2,2), nd(ind2,3), nd(ind2,4), nd(ind2,5)];
end

Accepted Answer

Dyuman Joshi
Dyuman Joshi on 3 May 2023
Edited: Dyuman Joshi on 3 May 2023
Generally, using find() and growing variables in a loop tend to cause the code to be slower. Here you can replace find() with logical indexing and use preallocation -
nd = [1 0 0 0.36 0; ...
2 0 -0.02 0.33 0; ...
3 0 -0.51 0.33 0; ...
4 0 -0.81 0.33 0; ...
5 0 -0.01 0.33 0; ...
6 0 -0.01 0.33 0; ...
7 0 -0.17 0.33 0; ...
8 0 -0.02 0.33 0; ...
9 0 -0.02 0.33 0; ...
10 0 -0.02 0.33 0];
eld = [1 2; 2 3; 3 4; 4 1; 1 3; 1 2];
n = size(eld,1);
%preallocation
eld2 = zeros(n,2*size(nd,2));
for i=1:n
%remove find
ind1 = ismember(nd(:,1),eld(i,1)); % find index to get the data row from nd variable.
ind2 = ismember(nd(:,1),eld(i,2));
% re-define the "el" variable using the first column of "nd" variable.
eld2(i,:) = [nd(ind1,1:5) nd(ind2,1:5)]; %combine the terms using indexing
end
eld2
eld2 = 6×10
1.0000 0 0 0.3600 0 2.0000 0 -0.0200 0.3300 0 2.0000 0 -0.0200 0.3300 0 3.0000 0 -0.5100 0.3300 0 3.0000 0 -0.5100 0.3300 0 4.0000 0 -0.8100 0.3300 0 4.0000 0 -0.8100 0.3300 0 1.0000 0 0 0.3600 0 1.0000 0 0 0.3600 0 3.0000 0 -0.5100 0.3300 0 1.0000 0 0 0.3600 0 2.0000 0 -0.0200 0.3300 0
There is another approach as well - Vectorization. As MATLAB is optimized for operation involving matrices and vectors, vectorization leads to faster performance in many cases
[~,n1]=ismember(eld(:,1),nd(:,1));
[~,n2]=ismember(eld(:,2),nd(:,1));
n1=nonzeros(n1);
n2=nonzeros(n2);
eld3 = [eld(n1,1) nd(n1,2:end) eld(n2,2) nd(n2,2:end)]
eld3 = 6×10
1.0000 0 0 0.3600 0 3.0000 0 -0.0200 0.3300 0 2.0000 0 -0.0200 0.3300 0 4.0000 0 -0.5100 0.3300 0 3.0000 0 -0.5100 0.3300 0 1.0000 0 -0.8100 0.3300 0 4.0000 0 -0.8100 0.3300 0 2.0000 0 0 0.3600 0 1.0000 0 0 0.3600 0 4.0000 0 -0.5100 0.3300 0 1.0000 0 0 0.3600 0 3.0000 0 -0.0200 0.3300 0
  2 Comments
Smithy
Smithy on 3 May 2023
Thank you very much for your answer. I really really really appreciate with it. I applied with your another approach and now it took less than 1 sec. Really wonderful.
Dyuman Joshi
Dyuman Joshi on 3 May 2023
That's the power of vectorization!
Glad to have helped :)

Sign in to comment.

More Answers (0)

Categories

Find more on Matrices and Arrays in Help Center and File Exchange

Tags

Products


Release

R2023a

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!