# fitting data with a combination of exponential and linear form ( a*exp(-x/b)+c*x+d )

15 views (last 30 days)

Show older comments

Hello Altruists,

I have been trying to fit my data to a combination of exponential and linear form, i.e., a*exp(-x/b)+c*x+d . I am not getting a good fit (image attached). I am getting an warning as well (Warning: Start point not provided, choosing random start point). Could anyone offer some help?

I have tried with this code:

data= readmatrix('data');

x= data(:,1);

y = data(:,2);

% getting fitting parameters

explinearfit = fittype('a*exp(-x/b)+c*x+d')

fo = fitoptions(explinearfit);

fo.normalize = 'on';

myFit = fit(x,y,explinearfit);

%plot

plot(myFit,x,y)

ylabel('Y')

xlabel('X')

legend('Data','Fit', 'location', 'best')

##### 0 Comments

### Answers (4)

Matt J
on 4 Jul 2023

Edited: Matt J
on 4 Jul 2023

If you download fminspleas, you can get a pretty good fit with a fairly naive initial guess [b,e,f]=[-1,0,0]:

[x,y]=readvars('data.csv');

flist={ @(p,x)exp(p(1)*x) ,@(p,x) x, 1, @(p,x)tanh(p(2)*x+p(3))};

warning off

[p,coeff]=fminspleas(flist,[-1,0,0],x,y,-inf(1,3),[0,inf,inf]); warning on

p(:).'

xs=linspace(min(x),max(x));

plot(x,y,'--g',xs, ffit(xs,p,coeff,flist));

function y=ffit(x,p,coeff,flist)

y=0;

for i=1:numel(flist)

f=flist{i};

if isnumeric(f)

y=y+coeff(i)*f;

else

y=y+coeff(i)*f(p,x);

end

end

end

##### 0 Comments

Torsten
on 3 Jul 2023

Moved: Torsten
on 3 Jul 2023

Try

f(x) = a*atan(b*x)

It's too steep at the beginning and too flat at the end, but better than your model function.

data= readmatrix('data');

x = data(:,1);

y = data(:,2);

f = @(p) p(1)*atan(p(2)*x);

fun = @(p) f(p) - y;

sol = lsqnonlin(fun,[2/pi 1])

hold on

plot(x,y,'o')

plot(x,f(sol))

hold off

Alex Sha
on 4 Jul 2023

If taking fitting function as "y=a*exp(-x/b)+c*x+d", the result will be:

Sum Squared Error (SSE): 0.473516174967249

Root of Mean Square Error (RMSE): 0.0194398036424297

Correlation Coef. (R): 0.993172772220197

R-Square: 0.986392155479551

Parameter Best Estimate

--------- -------------

a -0.626947642051749

b 1365.46862978889

c 1.57136165222552E-5

d 0.682801486192597

If taking fitting function as "y=a*exp(b*x)+c*exp(d*x)", the result will be:

Sum Squared Error (SSE): 0.517841961771885

Root of Mean Square Error (RMSE): 0.0203293308633968

Correlation Coef. (R): 0.992531430423344

R-Square: 0.985118640378209

Parameter Best Estimate

--------- -------------

a -0.637793104918275

b -0.00067464442828496

c 0.705787394940032

d 1.74592589676531E-5

A much better result will be obtained if taking fitting function as "y=a*exp(b*x)+c*x+d+tanh(e*x+f)*p"

Sum Squared Error (SSE): 0.154723411889559

Root of Mean Square Error (RMSE): 0.0111122622277951

Correlation Coef. (R): 0.997774312797138

R-Square: 0.995553579277802

Parameter Best Estimate

--------- -------------

a -0.44380788683452

b -0.000338851451599573

c 1.0070723631259E-5

d 0.571547658395962

e 0.0025117355962601

f -0.850904593274322

p 0.195041944730927

##### 3 Comments

Torsten
on 4 Jul 2023

Edited: Torsten
on 4 Jul 2023

Try if you can reproduce the results if you use the fitting parameters as initial guesses in MATLAB.

@Alex Sha has his "special tool" to do the fitting (not part of MATLAB), and I think he invests quite a long time to adequate initial guesses for the parameters.

Alex Sha
on 5 Jul 2023

Sam Chak
on 5 Jul 2023

The data seems to exhibit the pattern of an nth-root function (a form of the power function), given by

where is a negative exponent function that varies with x. Because the data is bounded by 1, we can assume that . Since the exponential function-based models yield some good results in @Alex Sha's fitting, I attempted with the following model:

Fit model #1

% Data Sets

[x, y] = readvars('data.csv');

% Curve-fitting

fo = fitoptions('Method', 'NonlinearLeastSquares', ...

'Lower', [-0.9, -0.006, -0.07, -0.0002, -1.2, -0.04, -0.2, -0.0008], ...

'Upper', [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], ...

'StartPoint', [1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1]);

ft = fittype('x^(a*exp(b*x) + c*exp(d*x) + e*exp(f*x) + g*exp(h*x))', 'options', fo);

[yfit, gof] = fit(x, y, ft)

figure

plot(x, y, '.', 'color', '#A7B7F7'), hold on

plot(yfit, 'r'), hold off, grid on

legend('Data', 'Fitted curve', 'location', 'best')

Note that the coefficients are not unique. In my machine, I got different results"

Fit model #2

General model:

f(x) = x^(a*exp(b*x) + c*exp(d*x) + e*exp(f*x) + g*exp(h*x))

Coefficients (with 95% confidence bounds):

a = -0.1227 (-0.1285, -0.1169)

b = -0.0007697 (-0.0008078, -0.0007315)

c = -0.06455 (-0.06617, -0.06292)

d = -0.0001311 (-0.0001335, -0.0001288)

e = -1.12 (-1.968, -0.2716)

f = -0.03423 (-0.0573, -0.01116)

g = -0.8431 (-0.929, -0.7572)

h = -0.005286 (-0.005609, -0.004962)

Goodness of fit:

SSE: 0.1438

R-square: 0.9959

Adjusted R-square: 0.9958

RMSE: 0.01075

Fit model #3

General model:

f(x) = x^(a*exp(b*x) + c*exp(d*x) + e*exp(f*x) + g*exp(h*x))

Coefficients (with 95% confidence bounds):

a = -0.8429 (-0.9291, -0.7566)

b = -0.005285 (-0.00561, -0.00496)

c = -0.06455 (-0.06617, -0.06292)

d = -0.0001311 (-0.0001335, -0.0001288)

e = -1.107 (-1.94, -0.2753)

f = -0.03402 (-0.05694, -0.01109)

g = -0.1227 (-0.1285, -0.1169)

h = -0.0007697 (-0.0008078, -0.0007315)

Goodness of fit:

SSE: 0.1438

R-square: 0.9959

Adjusted R-square: 0.9958

RMSE: 0.01075

##### 3 Comments

Alex Sha
on 5 Jul 2023

For fitting function provided by @Sam Chak, the results are actually unique, only the order is different

Sum Squared Error (SSE): 0.143801140894944

Root of Mean Square Error (RMSE): 0.0107128649564239

Correlation Coef. (R): 0.997931669471303

R-Square: 0.995867616933781

Parameter Best Estimate

--------- -------------

a -0.842982011054431

b -0.00528502909652476

c -0.122676258206711

d -0.000769613241785951

e -0.0645440331501187

f -0.000131143071549622

g -1.11996380236003

h -0.0342317204260728

### See Also

### Categories

### Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!