# Indexing portions of a vector with array

6 views (last 30 days)
Mohammed Kagalwala on 10 Dec 2019
Commented: Jeremy Marcyoniak on 10 Dec 2019
Hi,
I currently have a vector a that is 12 x1. I want to index it such that I get the following vector q = [a(4:7),a(4:7)]. I can create an array [4 4] and [7 7], when I try to index a([4 4], [7 7]). I only get q = a(4:7). Can someone help me with the correct syntax here? Is this even possible with this sort of indexing ?
Sample input:
a = [1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12];
Sample output:
q = [a(4:7),a(4:7)] = [4 5 6 7 4 5 6 7]
The size of a can vary and the index 4:7 can vary
Thank you.

Show 1 older comment
Mohammed Kagalwala on 10 Dec 2019
Jeremy Marcyoniak on 10 Dec 2019
What exactly is the problem? The code you provided appears to do what you are asking for
Mohammed Kagalwala on 10 Dec 2019
I want to perform this action in general where all I'm given is an array of start indecies and an array of stop indecies. In the example, provided above this would [4 4], [7 7]. This could be of size N. I want to create q using these two arrays, WITHOUT using for loops.

Jeremy Marcyoniak on 10 Dec 2019
Edited: Jeremy Marcyoniak on 10 Dec 2019
a = 1:12;
id_start = [4 4]';
id_stop = [7 7]';
c = arrayfun(@colon,id_start,id_stop,'UniformOutput',false);
d = cell2mat(c);
p = reshape(d',[1 numel(d)]);
q = a(p);

Mohammed Kagalwala on 10 Dec 2019
Thanks ! Works just as I described. Though I did a timing test against a for-loop which showed the for-loop was the faster method. I'm curious if there's a way to beat a for-loops speed.
Jeremy Marcyoniak on 10 Dec 2019
I think arrayfun is, in general, not great if you are looking to optimize efficiency. But you asked for no loops and I wanted to solve the puzzle - I wasn't able to get the colon operator to work on the array of start and stop indices without it. Maybe there is another way...