how to solve 1D heat equation by Crank-Nicolson method

170 views (last 30 days)
I need to solve a 1D heat equation by Crank-Nicolson method . The tempeture on both ends of the interval is given as the fixed value u(0,t)=2, u(L,t)=0.5. I solve the equation through the below code, but the result is wrong. Attached figures are the correct result. I don't know why? Could you please anyone offer me a hand? Thanks a lot.
clear all;
L=1;
dx=0.1;
imax=L/dx+1;
X=linspace(0,L,imax);
% inital value
f0 = 2-1.5.*X+sin(pi.*X);
dt=0.05;
nstep=15;
D=1.44;
alpha=D*dt/(dx)^2;
e = ones(imax,1);
B = [-alpha*e 2*(1+alpha)*e -alpha*e];
Lx = spdiags(B,[-1 0 1],imax,imax);
B = [alpha*e 2*(1-alpha)*e alpha*e];
Rx = spdiags(B,[-1 0 1],imax,imax);
%%CN method:
u=zeros(imax,nstep+1);
u(:,1)=(f0)';
for n=2:nstep+1
u(:,n)=Lx\(Rx*u(:,n-1));
% boundary value
u(1,n)=2;
u(end,n)=0.5;
end
% display contour plot
t=[0:nstep];
[Xg,tg] = meshgrid(X,t);
figure;
contourf(Xg,tg,u.');
  4 Comments
reyhdh saleh
reyhdh saleh on 1 Jan 2022
%This program is meant to test out the Crank-Nicolson scheme using a simple
%nonlinear diffusion scheme.
n=5000;m=30;
t=linspace(0,20,n);% set time and distance scales
x=linspace(0,1,m);
dx=x(2)-x(1);dt=t(2)-t(1); %Increments
s=dt/(2*dx^2);%Useful for the solution.
u=zeros(n,m); %set up solution matrix
p=s*ones(1,m-1); q=-(1+2*s)*ones(1,m);
Z=diag(p,1)+diag(p,-1)+diag(q);
A=Z(2:m-1,2:m-1);
%Add in intial condition:
u(1,:)=exp(-5*(x-0.5).^2);
v=zeros(m-2,1);
%Solve the system
for i=2:n-1
%Construct the RHS for the solution
for j=2:m-1
v(j-1)=s*u(i-1,j+1)-(2*s+1)*u(i-1,j)-s*u(i-1,j-1);
end
%Solve for the new time step
w=A\v;
u(i,2:m-1)=w;
u(i,1)=u(i,2);
u(i,end)=u(i,end-1);
end
I have problem ....
Undefined function or variable 'Crank'
what does it mean
Torsten
Torsten on 1 Jan 2022
We don't know since the string "Crank" (most probably for Crank-Nicholson) does not appear in the code you posted.
You can run the code from above just as it is as a script in MATLAB.

Sign in to comment.

Accepted Answer

Jiali
Jiali on 20 Feb 2020
I figure out that the boundary is dealt with incorrectly. After re-deriving the matrix to include the boundary value, I finally get the correct result.

More Answers (1)

Jiali
Jiali on 16 Mar 2020
Dear Darova,
The below code is What I figure out. Hopefully it helps someone.
u=zeros(length(X),nstep+1);
u(:,1)=(f0)';
% boundary value
u(1,:)=2;
u(end,:)=0.5;
imax=length(X)-2; % remove boundary point
e = ones(imax,1);
A = [-alpha*e 2*(1+alpha)*e -alpha*e];
Lx = spdiags(A,[-1 0 1],imax,imax);
B = [alpha*e 2*(1-alpha)*e alpha*e];
Rx = spdiags(B,[-1 0 1],imax,imax);
%% CN method:
for n=2:nstep+1
% adjust the right matrix based on the fixed value on boundary
temp=zeros(imax,1);
temp(1)=alpha*2*u(1,n);
temp(end)=alpha*2*u(end,n);
u(2:end-1,n)=Lx\(Rx*u(2:end-1,n-1)+temp);
end

Categories

Find more on Programming in Help Center and File Exchange

Products


Release

R2015a

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!