Fsolve error: relative norm of the current step is less than max(option​s.StepTole​rance^2,ep​s) = 1.000000e-12

2 views (last 30 days)
Hello everyone,
I am running the following code, however, I observe an error:
fsolve stopped because the relative norm of the current step, 7.033578e-13, is less than
max(options.StepTolerance^2,eps) = 1.000000e-12. However, the sum of squared function
values, r = 3.409018e+18, exceeds sqrt(options.FunctionTolerance) = 1.000000e-03.
Optimization Metric Options
relative norm(step) = 7.03e-13 max(StepTolerance^2,eps) = 1e-12 (default)
r = 3.41e+18 sqrt(FunctionTolerance) = 1.0e-03 (default)
function F = new(x);
kap_dep = 0.0036;
kap_div = 0.0012;
thetam = 3.53;
mtgparam = thetam/(thetam-1);
thetad = - 1.46;
depparam = thetad/(thetad-1);
div_bar = 9;
chi_saver = 0.601;
log_refi_rate = -3.282968022102128;
log_non_am_share = -0.004357084122431;
log_new_loan_size = 0.484804774865286;
log_nu_t = -0.012277614667639;
log_debt = 0.212443935354230;
log_mstar_bank = 0.193437105171249;
mbank = exp(3.204035192501455);
log_y = -0.033219520228313;
log_ph = -0.282925342335558;
log_h_saver = 1.742131415613060;
log_R_new = 0.015649702109572;
log_inflation_factor = -0.007920530545208;
log_Lam_saver_debt = 0.448184815036209;
log_Lam_saver_0_inv = 0.463834545296377;
Rdep = depparam*(exp(log_R_new)-kap_dep);
log_R_dep = log(depparam*(exp(log_R_new)-kap_dep));
log_pay_bank = 3.300154738807201;
log_m_bank = 3.204035192501455;
F(1) = exp(log_refi_rate) * (exp(x(5)) + (1.0-exp(log_non_am_share)))* exp(log_new_loan_size) +exp(log_nu_t)*x(1)*(1.0-exp(log_refi_rate)) + exp(log_refi_rate)*exp(log_nu_t)*exp(log_debt) - x(1);
F(2) = exp(log_mstar_bank)*(exp(x(5)) - exp(log_non_am_share))+ (1.0 - exp(log_refi_rate))*x(2)*exp(log_nu_t)+ exp(log_refi_rate)*exp(log_nu_t)*exp(mbank) - x(2);
F(3) = exp(log_y) + exp(x(4)) - del*exp(log_ph)*exp(log_h_saver) + (Rdep+kap_dep)*exp(log_inflation_factor)*x(3) - x(3);
F(4) = log(exp(log_inflation_factor)*(exp(log_pay_bank) -exp(log_R_new)*exp(log_m_bank) - exp(log_mstar_bank) + (exp(log_R_new) - exp(log_R_dep) - kap_dep)*chi_saver * x(3)) - kap_div*0.5*(exp(x(4)) - div_bar).^2) - x(4);
F(5) = log(mtgparam*(1.0/x(6) + exp(log_non_am_share) - x(7)/x(6))) - x(5);
F(6) = exp(log_Lam_saver_debt)*(x(6)/exp(log_Lam_saver_0_inv)*exp(log_non_am_share)*(1.0 -exp(log_refi_rate)) + 1.0/(1.0 + kap_div*(exp(x(4))-div_bar))) - x(6);
F(7) = exp(log_Lam_saver_debt)*(x(7)/exp(log_Lam_saver_0_inv)*exp(log_non_am_share)*(1.0 -exp(log_refi_rate))+exp(log_refi_rate)*exp(log_non_am_share)*x(6)/exp(log_Lam_saver_0_inv)+1.0/(1.0 + kap_div*(exp(x(4))-div_bar))-(1.0/((1.0 + kap_div*(exp(x(4))-div_bar))*exp(log_Lam_saver_0_inv)))*exp(log_R_new)*exp(log_inflation_factor)) - x(7);
Then I run
x0=rand(1,7);
x=fsolve(@new,x0)
I looked at other documentations and tried options. Could you tell me or provide guidance on how to approach this problem? Thanks.
  10 Comments
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson on 8 Dec 2021
Alex Sha uses the commercial package at http://www.7d-soft.com/en/
Alex has posted a number of excellent results from the package over the years. I am sometimes able to do slightly better, but it takes me hours to do better than what Alex can do in a few minutes.
However, the software is not inexpensive. I think the price is probably worth it for people who do a lot of optimization... but I would not be able to justify it for myself, for example.

Sign in to comment.

Answers (0)

Categories

Find more on Loops and Conditional Statements in Help Center and File Exchange

Tags

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!